For once, let me side with Education Minister, Bosiram Siram
and venture on his romantic escapade- 100% literacy by 2017! Without implying or even hinting, in any which way, that the
well-intended aspiration and ambition is bordering on the unrealistic rhetoric,
lets appreciate that there are
structural challenges in the way of achieving 100% literacy that Siram needs to
take cognisance of; bereft of which it would fail, statistically by a margin of at
least 25-30%. Setting his sight on the moon, optimistically, Siram is sure
of plucking at least a few stars if nothing else.
The statistical concern stems from the last census report
wherein “once upon a time” credible organisation threw up exotic census data
including record-breaking 114% decadal population growth in Kurung Kumey
besides recording at least 15-20% "ghost-population" residing in every village.
Given the Planning Commission of India’s approach to fund allocation
method--linking budget-to-population, I expect ghost-population to exist in foreseeable
future as much. Adding to the ghost-population is the ghost-student
enrollment, a new phenomenon witnessed in the last few years. There are
hundreds and thousands of “ghost students”-- on thumb-rule at least 5-10% fresh
enrollments in many of the far-flung schools. Pocket boroughs have been created
to siphon-off stipends meant for the students. In essence, seeking comfort in
75000 fresh enrollments in the last 3 years, that’s roughly 4%, as Siram
claimed recently in the media, has been taken with a pinch of salt by those in
the know of this “ghost enrollment” business. It is hoped that these “ghosts”
do not resurrect in later years to haunt the accomplices. With the preceding
observations, there is very little alternative but to revalidate the census
report and school enrollment records.
However the second approach albeit a more contentious one
involves a bit of “crystal ball gazing” despite sticking to available data. Method of picking this class of
population may not be entirely scientific yet provides as an indicator to the
state of ignored population. With life expectancy improving dramatically, there
are ‘antique’ populations, who have never been to school, still hanging around,
on one side and on the other side, not much progress has been made under adult
literacy programme in villages. There are villages where adult education
officers have not set foot in ages, forget educating them. We cannot wish-away
such sizeable population of at least another 5-10%, not even in data
compilations as is usually the case.
Aforementioned two inherent challenges standing tall, wide
and long as the “Great Wall of China” against Siram’s seminal goal, one needs
to acknowledge and entertain the importance of ability to read; leaving aside
the ability to decipher or comprehend- the very basic of quality education. In
the recent past, the quality-education has become a propriety subject over
which private sector apparently has claimed exclusivity, nudging-off the
government schools; herein comes the question of incumbents repeated attempt to
fail the well designed system, structure and policy.
Quality education, a least talked about dimension in the
policy discourse of the state, is a matter of grave concern; a concern,
unfortunately, relegated to the ghettos. In the state-specific context as much
as the global arena, emphasis on quality is not an aesthetic sermon but an
essential ingredient in the survival tool-kit. In the knowledge-era, ability to
synthesize and comprehend is taken as a common yardstick of quality-education.
Thus, discerning youths fear for the relevance of education, in its current
form that is being disseminated by the graduates of open/distance education
courses.
Quality alone is the panacea but derision of the same in the
narratives of education policy and priorities in the state must be subjected to
correction. Or else, 100% literacy drive, sans quality, would remain an
eccentric indulgence in romantic trail. However with quality topping onto
literacy mission, it would appear as more palatable bait for all stakeholders.
No comments:
Post a Comment